THE IMPORTANCE OF THE APOSTOLIC TRADITIONS
2 Thes. 2:13 But we are bound to give thanks always
to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the
beginning chosen you to … belief of the truth:… .15 Therefore,
brethren, stand fast, and hold the
traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
"Tradition... Tradition!" goes
the musical phrase from the song in Fiddler
on the Roof, and the audience is inexorably drawn from that introduction
into Tevye's skirmishes against the modern world’s encroachments into his
family’s life. "Because of our traditions everyone knows who he is and
what God expects him to do," explains the irrepressible Tevye.
"Without our traditions, our lives would be as shaky as... a fiddler on the
roof!"
Tradition: often besmirched as the villain of true spirituality in
the Christian's life, castigated as the enemy of deep spiritual understanding,
avoided as dead legalism, blamed for all manner of spiritual ills and lack of
fervor—this is the attitude of many in our day. After all, didn't Jesus roundly
condemn those who practiced traditions in Mark 7: 8 ? “For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of
men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.” 9 And he said unto them, “Full well ye reject the commandment
of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.”
So, those who hold to traditions and practice them in the Body of
Christ are often regarded as legalistic, immature—unable to sustain meat and
needing milk, and sometimes, as cultic.
But is this a fair assessment? Tevye, by the traditions handed
down through generations of faithful Jews, knew who he was and what God
expected of him. Tevye confesses, “How did these traditions get started? I'll
tell you… I don't know!" Nevertheless, he endeavored to live by the
traditions that gave the Jews in Russia (and around the world) a sense of
stability in what often proved to be a hostile environment. Remarkably, those
traditions have kept the Jewish race separate (for a large part) from the cultures
and peoples where they’ve been dispersed. Think of it, has any other conquered
people, dispossessed for thousands of years from their homeland, been able to
keep their ethnicity intact as have the Jews? Most, if not all, transplanted
peoples aer soon absorbed into the cultures in which they lived, adapting for
survival's sake, thus becoming 'mongrelized' as ethnic groups. But not the
Jews! They maintained their individual identity and culture as God's chosen
people, avoiding absorption into the 'melting pot' civilizations they found
themselves amongst. This is a hallmark of God's hand upon them for purposes yet
to be accomplished. Other races and ethnic groups have no such Divine
appointment to be used in the end of the age in bringing about the fulfillment
of God's mysteries, so it’s of little consequence if the other races and
cultures of the world mix. But God promised to return the Jews to their
homeland for the purpose of ending Gentile world rule, and establishing Zion in
safety (Eze. 39:25-29).
Many of the traditions held by modern Jewry have little or no base
in Scripture, instead, having their origin in the writings of respected Rabbis,
who, down over the centuries addressed specific issues that cropped up threatening
the delicate balance Jews have striven to maintain under the pressures of
persecution and/or syncretism.
Sadly, in many ways, these 'uninspired traditions' have hurt the
Jewish cause more than helped, for they replaced the actual commandments of God.
The Jews were chosen by God to bless all nations of the earth, for through them
came the Law, which slowed down the destruction of mankind that accompanied
lawlessness; and secondly, through them came the Messiah and the fulfillment of
what the Law promised but could never accomplish in itself; thirdly, through
Israel and the Jewish people we have a sense of God’s eschatological alarm clock;
and finally, through select Jews, Jesus will come and reign again from Mt. Zion
as Revelation 14 foretells. Yes, humanity owes much to the Jewish traditions
that have kept them culturally distinct from Gentiles. It’s little wonder that
through the centuries Satan has arrayed himself so strongly against the Jews,
for if they were to be eliminated as a race, God would be proven a liar, and
His punishment of the satanic rebellion held in abeyance, for Jews have an
integral part to play in the procession of the final events, according to God's
Word.
We see, then, the importance traditions of the Diaspora (Jews
dispersed throughout the world) played in maintaining their Chosen People
status. However, their extra-scriptural traditions changed their expectations
of Messiah into something other than what God originally revealed. This is how
traditions have harmed the Jewish people. Let me explain.
A careful study of Hebrews reveals that the formulaic rites and
traditions of Judaism given by God to Moses, represented, in one way or
another, the life and ministry of Messiah, Jesus. The writer of Hebrews goes on
to explain that the Law was merely a shadow—a flat, monochrome, two-dimensional
representation of the dynamic, multi-dimensional, many-hued reality of Grace
and Truth. The Law could not make men perfect, but what it represented would
when it came (Heb. 10:1,9). When Messiah appeared, they were to see the
fulfillment of the law in Him and joyfully follow. Instead, they argued with
Him, and rejected Him for being a scofflaw, finally executing Him on a trumped
up charge of blasphemy. How could this happen? How could a people longing for
their Messiah reject Him when He finally came?
Imagine a young woman betrothed to a soldier called away on a
military mission before they could arrange nuptials. Before he leaves, he gives
her his most recent photograph to remember him by. The young man knows the girl
of his dreams has a tendency to be rather fickle, and will begin to cast her
eyes closer to home for a lover to replace the one she's to await. So, he gives
her his photograph in the hopes that as she longingly looks to it each day, her
heart won’t stray, but yearn for his return. For the first several months the
young woman carries the photo and shows it to her friends at every opportunity,
proudly showing off her beau.
Then one day she left it home, and only thought of him after her busy
day when she sat down at night. This soon became a regular practice, and
sometimes, when she had had a particularly hard day and was very tired, she
would go to sleep without looking at the picture and thinking of her betrothed.
One day as she looked at the picture and thought of her fiancé,
she wondered how he might have changed since he’d been absent. Had he grown a
beard? Did he now wear glasses? Did he have any scars from combat? Had he lost
or gained weight? Had harsh experiences altered his gentle eyes or the kind
smile he always wore? Wondering about these things, she absently-mindedly took
a pencil in hand and filled in a beard and mustache, then added glasses, just
to see what he would look like if any of those things had happened. It soon became
a weekly ritual to alter some part of his appearance, and as she did so, she
began to believe the changes had indeed occurred.
Two years went by, and the people she showed her fiancé’s photo to
could get no clear indication of what her fiancé looked like. She was now convinced
that this was how her beau looked.
Then a letter came announcing her beau's imminent arrival. A
telegram said to meet him at the train station. His tour of duty was over; he
was coming home to claim his bride. She went to the depot at the appointed time
and carefully scanned each soldier getting off the train, but none of them matched
her picture! When a handsome young man rushed up to her and tried to sweep her
off her feet, she screamed and slapped him and ran away terrified. It was her
lover, looking exactly like the day the photo had been taken, but her
distortions of the image had changed her expectation. The man she now waited
for didn’t exist. She rejected her true lover in favor of the imaginary man
she’d invented.
This is exactly what Israel did. Jesus came proclaiming the
Kingdom of God, but because so many man-made regulations and traditions had
replaced the God-given commands and traditions, the Jews were (and still are)
expecting someone else, someone conjured up by their imaginations.
Mk.7:13 Making the
word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like
things do ye.
It’s important to note that Jesus did not condemn all traditions,
just those originated by man that supplanted God-given traditions. The
traditions God gave the Israelites were meant to stabilize them as a people,
keep them close to Him and prevent their being assimilated into the cultures to
which He allowed them to be taken. But the alterations, additions and subtractions
to their dogma, not being inspired, didn’t have the same goal as God's commands
and traditions. Such additions were made by imperfect and non-omniscient,
religious thinkers, and therefore, were able only to relate to needs on a
limited scale.
Not so with God's traditions, for He, knowing the beginning from
the end, knew just what images were needed to keep the memory and devotion to
Him alive. Had Israel not taken out the true traditions and replaced them with
ones that seemed so logical and wise at the time, they wouldn’t have missed
their Messiah when He came.
But, that was all a part of the plan, for it was necessary that
Israel's heart be hardened for a season, in order to bring the Gentile nations
to the reality of gospel. Thus Israel’s error contained lessons for the Church
to learn by reading of Israel's consequences by departing from the inspired
scriptures.
THE CHURCH AGE
But what does that have to do with the Church Age? We in the
Church are not to be 'bound up' with traditions and legalistic commands, are
we? We are free! Didn’t Paul, the great expositor of The Faith declare: Gal. 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke
of bondage…?
The epistle to the Galatians is a masterpiece of exposition,
encouraging us to throw off the compunctions and guilt arising from the Law and
instead, live in the Spirit. It would be wrong for us to live by traditions and
commands again, would it not? Paul reaffirms this stance in Colossians: .2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through
philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the
rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
Indeed, this verse is ignored by a large segment of the Church
except for its condemnation of tradition! We ourselves study, and send our
children away to study at worldly institutions to learn the philosophies and
vain deceits of worldliness, but stand foursquare against any intrusion of
religious tradition into our lives. “Traditions are for lame churches and
people that don’t have a vital relationship to God through the active presence
of the Holy Spirit in their midst.” We have adopted a condescending attitude
toward “less spiritual brethren” who rely on traditions for religious feelings
and experiences. Granted, there is much abuse of tradition in liturgical
churches.
But both sides,
anti-tradition and pro-tradition, suffer for lack of understanding.
Saying that Jesus and Paul taught against tradition is woefully
ignorant of the Scriptures. Believe it or not, Jesus and Paul, and the other
apostles as well, encouraged the use of tradition in church meetings.
·
2Th.2:15 Therefore,
brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
·
2Th.3:6 Now we
command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw
yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which
he received of us.
·
2Peter 3:2 That ye
may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by
the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles
of the Lord and Savior:
·
Rev. 2:5 Remember
therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first
works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy
candlestick out of his place, except thou repent.
·
Jude1:3 Beloved,
when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was
needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly
contend for the faith which was once and for all delivered unto
the saints.
This sampling of verses shows that the Church is not without its
own set of rules and regulations—traditions and commandments, if you will. But
the important thing to keep in mind is that these traditions and commands the
Church is to keep were once and for all time (Jude vs. 3) ordained by God
through His apostles, not by later generations of Christians expositing and
conjecturing, as did the ancient rabbis of Israel. Man-made traditions have caused
a dearth in the Church, not because all traditions are part of a dead,
formalistic or legalistic religion, but because the ones practiced by much of
the Church are altered or man-invented, not practiced as the ones God ordained!
The apostle John reveals what is truly in our hearts when he
equates loving God with being obedient to God's commands, daring to insinuate
that if we 'claim' to love God but do not actively obey his commands, we are
lying to Him, ourselves and others!
I John 2:3 And
hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. 4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments,
is a liar, and the truth is not in him. 5 But whoso keepeth his word, in
him verily is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him.
6 He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he
walked.
When were the apostles given these commandments? Matthew gives us
some insight: Matt. 28:19 Go ye
therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the
Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: 20 Teaching them
to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am
with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
What were the disciples to teach? Whatever Jesus commanded to be
taught. And the apostles faithfully taught the traditions Jesus wanted given to
the Church, preserving in “living picture” form the truths of the Gospel. As
Jesus taught truth in parable, or word pictures, so too, the traditions laid
down in the pages of the epistles are the express instruction of the Lord,
giving visible reminders of spiritual truth that He gave His apostles in order to
establish and protect the Church from lukewarmness and deception.
PAUL’S ADMONITION
2 Thes. 2:13 But
we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the
Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to … belief of the truth:…
.15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or
our epistle.
Paul, in II Thessalonians, links their observance of the
traditions he taught to their standing firm in sanctification and truth. He’s
not indicating that traditions alone can sanctify them or keep them in the
truth, but is indicating that without the traditions they run the risk of loosing
from their moorings and being set adrift on a sea of syncretism, leading to eventual
deception and shipwreck of their faith.
The Greek Interlinear Translation even indicates that we are to strongly hold
to the things taught, giving every effort to maintain what was once delivered.
Am I overstating the case for scriptural traditions? Could the
traditions of the Faith really be that important? Aren’t the traditions of the
Faith secondary considerations when compared to topics such as salvation,
sanctification, gifts of the Spirit, the Five-fold Ministry and such? Is it
majoring on minors to keep such things as water baptism, communion,
foot-washing, head coverings (or not), women's and men's role in the home and
church, agape meals, etc.?
Look where Paul positions this reminder to carefully observe the
traditions he took pains to teach by word and writing (which included what he
taught other churches as well, for no inspired truth of Scripture is intended
for only one locality—or era.) Paul is in the midst of reminding the
Thessalonians about the events which will signal the end of the Age and the
return of the Lord—chiefly, the danger of many falling away from the true Faith
into a clever counterfeit faith, and the arrival upon the world's stage of the
person known as the Antichrist, who, with all deceptive devices will give
those who love not the truth a surrogate cause and
person to believe. This man will have Satan's own power of deception to deceive
even the elect if they let down their guard and make it possible (Matt 24:24).
That the danger of the elect being deceived is even mentioned shows that it is
possible to be deceived away from the truth if they don’t take care to guard
the truths given to them (see also Col. 1:23; Rom. 11:22, John 15:10; Jude 21;
and Rev. 3:5 for a study on the possibility of believers being drawn away from
the Faith). In the midst of this passage about the deceptive dangers prevalent
in the end times, Paul admonishes the Church to cling to the teachings he’s
given them—both the oral tradition and the ceremonial observances that
celebrate in picture form those truths that will remind and keep them in the
true Faith.
So what is Paul saying? He’s declaring that believers stand firm in
their salvation by two things: sanctification by the Spirit, and belief in the truth
(John 4:23-24).
So how does Paul advise they should cling to the truth? By
observing the traditions—the combination of oral teaching and written Scripture
and ceremonial observances. A wise person once coined the phrase,
"A picture is worth a thousand words," and that’s precisely the
function of the ceremonial observances given by the Lord to the apostles to
teach the Church.
A tradition is a visible commemoration or re-enactment of an event
and/or truth that keeps said event or truth alive, vital and accurate in the
mind and heart of observers. In other words, Paul exhorts the Thessalonians to
keep the practices and teachings he taught them alive and active as safeguards
against falling into deception that will be so rampant in the Last Days.
For instance, by observing the Lord's Table, in eating the bread
and drinking the cup, we examine ourselves afresh in the light of the Lord's
sacrifice and promise of a New Covenant. As each believer partakes, they are
reminded and refreshed in their love for and obedience to the Lord. To alter
this tradition in any way is to alter the perception of truth represented to subsequent
generations. A false concept of Who Jesus is, and what He did, and our own
responsibility to Him would then permeate the Church, and deception would enter
and be a leavening influence to the detriment of the saints. Just as Moses was
sternly commanded to "...and look
that thou make them after their pattern which was shown thee in the mount..."(Ex.
25:40) we are warned to keep
the body of truth known as the Faith in pristine condition. The ceremonial
observances, few though they be, are ordained for this very purpose: to keep
the Church's teaching based in the historical record and not on the flux of new
movements or progressive understanding or societal change.
Water baptism is a ceremonial tradition which teaches volumes
about our new life in Christ, the death of the old man and the resurrection
life of the believer. To change it, say from immersion to sprinkling, or from
the participant being a professing believer to being an unknowing infant,
alters the teaching and affirmation of truth inherent in the ceremony, and
therefore, the perception of truth. Immersion declares the death and
burial of our Lord Jesus on our behalf, whereas sprinkling leaves
the observers bereft of any true interpretation of the meaning of the symbolism
in the ceremony. On the same token, baptizing infants who have made no
declaration of faith themselves, but are represented by their parents in
wishful hoping that the child will live for the Lord, is to rob the power of
renouncing citizenship to the world and claiming citizenship in heaven. This is
how altering a tradition alters the Church’s cognizance of the truth, leading
to deception and spiritual death. It’s tremendously important what we believe,
for what we believe and practice influences how we live (I Cor. 15:2).
Like the young lady in the parable above, the Church is often a
fickle, betrothed bride-to-be, lacking patience, soon losing interest in her
departed Lover, seeking fulfillment elsewhere. She soon wanders away from her
Lover's true visage, inventing another, imaginary person in his place. This
'other person' she invents lets her do what she will, since his picture is not
a true representation of him anymore. Isaiah 4:1 denotes seven women who want
to feed themselves and clothe themselves with their own desires; only they want
to belong to a husband in name so they’ll not bear the reproach of being
strong-willed, unmarried women. This is the Church today, refusing His teaching
and substituting truth with psychology, philosophy, compromise, error and
self-esteem; refusing His righteousness, but wearing rags of their own “good
works” such as charitable contributions to various causes that don’t further
the Gospel and Kingdom of Christ.
When we deface the images the Lord left us of Himself, we also
alter the concept of Him that the world sees when they look at us. And new
believers receive diluted, if not perverted, impotent teaching. The Lord left
instructions, which, if observed in the right spirit, will keep us aware of the
original truth He gave His apostles. When we delete or alter the traditions He
gave us, we are inexorably drawn toward deception that can only result in a lack
of love for the truth. It’s for this reason Paul inserts into his stark
description of the realities of the End Time the reminder to adhere to the
teachings and traditions God gave the Church. The teachings given by the
apostles are not to be added to, nor altered, and especially not deleted lest
the Church (or that part of the Church that does so) become further removed
from the truth and deceived, eventually falling away from the true Faith once
and for all delivered unto the saints (Jude vs. 3).
In spite of Paul's stern admonition in I Cor. 15:37-38 that, if
any think themselves spiritual or prophetic, but does not recognize his
apostolic commands from the Lord's servants, though they think highly of
themselves, and others may regard them as something, the Lord does not
recognize them! What are the Lord's commands? The Lord’s commands are all the
things Paul wrote in his epistles, as well as the things Luke, Peter, James, John
and Jude mention. Satan attacks these traditions with a vehemence, seeking to
remove visible reminders of truth from before the eyes of the faithful so they’ll
be lacking in the understanding and transmission of the Faith; thus, in the
Church, the knowledge of the Lord and His ways will degenerate until the final
apostasy overtakes her. II Pet. 2:2 indicates that many will be led
astray into this pernicious way. Doubtless, those in apostasy won’t be aware
they’re deceived, for that’s the nature of deception—blinding one's eyes to
peril. But those who are deceived will be accountable before the Lord. Why?
Because the Lord gave safeguards to help us stay true to the Faith via the
teachings and traditions of the apostles. But sadly, they decided such rules
and regulations were too burdensome. Truly, the commands of the Lord are not burdensome ( I Jn. 5:3), especially in light of what will happen if not
kept.
Thank God we have the New Testament which faithfully records these
traditions and teachings. Sadly, much of the Church has accepted the satanic
lie that the traditions are legalistic, of minor importance, not for today, or
can be tailored to fit our changing cultures. We’ve lost the witness God
established us to proclaim. Just as the Jews were given the tradition of
Passover, daubing the lintels with blood, and eating the roasted lamb, so too
the Church has its commemorative ceremonies that represent important truths to
be observed faithfully.
There is a danger, though, as stated earlier, for traditions to
become vain, empty rituals, even if observed to the letter.
LEGALISM?
The matter of head coverings is one such issue that has suffered
first, empty observance, and then disregard. The meaning of head covering has
been forgotten, often labeled “legalistic.” Let us be clear: legalism is what
the Pharisees did to the Scriptures—adding man’s traditions and teachings, and holding
them higher than God’s inspired word. The opposite of legalism is not grace, as
is commonly thought and taught in the Church; no, the opposite of legalism is
lawlessness! And by discarding God’s given traditions—and understanding the
reason and meanings behind such traditions, the Church has committed lawlessness!
The issue of head-coverings can be treated legalistically, but that doesn’t make
the practice itself legalistic. When understood and kept in spiritual
perspective, women wearing a sign of submitting to their husband’s authority on
their heads bespeaks a beautiful sense of God’s order in the meeting. The same
holds true for men not wearing such a sign of being under visible authority,
for Christ is the Head of the Church, and He is invisible in our meetings. As a
final clincher that the practice was not deemed cultural, Paul mentions that
angels are in observance in every meeting, and their ministry is affected by
whether or not the meeting is in proper order. Disregarding scripture that has
a spiritual, and not a cultural base is being in jeopardy of practicing
lawlessness. Paul’s reasons for advising head-coverings for women while praying
and/or prophesying, and advising men not to be covered during the same
activities is based on spiritual values which he clearly mentions, referring to
God’s order of creating man and woman and their roles.
We must ponder: would the Lord establish, in Scripture, a
meaningless tradition that only applied to the First Century Church. In fact,
this is one of the commands that Paul mentions in I Cor. 15:37-38 which must be
recognized as from the Lord. Until sixty years ago, nearly every woman in
church sported a hat of some sort, from big, flowery, vision blockers, to
humble, demure scarves. There was scarcely a woman not wearing a covering; and
nary a man who dared wear one in the House of the Lord. But, there was no teaching
of why. Women's rights campaigns throughout the world and in the Church
assaulted what they termed chauvinistic attitudes, and the Church, instead of
exhuming forgotten truth, agreed with the adversaries of truth, and removed the
“oppressive” symbol.
What they failed to realize was that with it, they removed the
symbol demonstrating God's authority and rule in the Church and in the home (I
Cor. 11:3). Since then, more truth has eroded from both Church and society, and
the world is in a headlong plunge to destruction. Is there a connection?
Without delving deeper into the meanings of these traditions, it’s clear that
the Church has wandered far afield, not only from the visible reminders of
important truths, but from those very truths of spiritual authority as well.
The traditions, when combined with scripture, were to keep alive and vibrant
the understanding of truth; when the traditions were removed, the Church no
longer had vibrant, visible reminders of those truths that were represented. Erosion
of truth in the Church has resulted. When the Church ceases to be salt and
light, the surrounding world becomes more entrenched in darkness.
When contrary to the Word, women stand in pulpits delivering
sermons, sprinkling instead of baptism is practiced, foot-washing is ignored, how
can the Church say she has the truth of the fathers of the Faith? How can the
Church not slide into great deception when they overthrow the doctrines and
traditions from the Lord in favor of “pop culture?”
No, the traditions were not given by the Lord to the apostles as
lightweight stuff, to be practiced optionally, changed, or forgotten. In some
mystical way, they declare His truth through ceremonial form to both the
Church—as reminders of what is important—and to the unbelieving world of what
they are missing.
